On 29/04/19 15:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > The problem that caused me to waste so much time on identifying the > problem was that I somehow thought I had the latest tarballs from > which I made the installation, and the tiny difference between "-2" > and "-3" in the file names is hard to spot, especially since the > version-specific files under libexec all go into .../8.2.0/. That's specified by the GCC folks, upstream, so I don't think there's a lot I can do about what the libexec subdirectory is called; the "-2" vs. "-3" qualifiers are binary package issue serial numbers, which we have introduced, to indicate build updates, usually to correct some anomaly within a previous build, from identically the same source package. I know you prefer to manage your installation manually, (and that's absolutely fine), but had you used mingw-get, (esp. the GUI), it would not have fallen foul of a "-2" vs. "-3" oversight -- you could have readily seen that you didn't have the latest packages installed. -- Regards, Keith. Public key available from keys.gnupg.net Key fingerprint: C19E C018 1547 DE50 E1D4 8F53 C0AD 36C6 347E 5A3F -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://lists.osdn.me/mailman/archives/mingw-users/attachments/20190429/de5bbab5/attachment.sig>
Fork