[Mingw-users] old binutils with 8.2.0 compiler

Back to archive index
Keith Marshall keith****@users*****
Sun Dec 30 16:09:44 JST 2018


On 30/12/18 05:00, Keith Marshall wrote:
> On 30/12/18 03:35, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> You can find the MinGW port of the latest Binutils here:
>>
>>   https://sourceforge.net/projects/ezwinports/files/
> 
> If you want to manage your installation with mingw-get, please DO
> NOT use this.  I'm sure Eli has provided a perfectly good build, but
> I know he doesn't use mingw-get.  If you use his distribution, you
> will surely screw up your mingw-get installation records, with
> adverse future consequences.

FWIW, here's what happens when you circumvent mingw-get's installation
procedure, and then subsequently try a mingw-get upgrade:

> upgrade: binutils-2.31.1-1-mingw32-bin.tar.xz
>  removing release binutils-2.28-1-mingw32-bin.tar.xz
>  installing binutils-2.31.1-1-mingw32-bin.tar.xz
> mingw-get-gui: *** ERROR ***
> c:\mingw\sandbox\/mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xe: extraction failed
> mingw-get-gui: *** ERROR ***
> c:\mingw\sandbox\/mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xe: probable package
> conflict; existing file not overwritten

In this case, the error is fairly benign; it can be resolved by manually
deleting the conflicting file, then running (from the CLI):

  $ mingw-get install --reinstall binutils-bin

but, in more extreme cases, it can become extremely painful to resolve
such conflicts.

-- 
Regards,
Keith.

Public key available from keys.gnupg.net
Key fingerprint: C19E C018 1547 DE50 E1D4 8F53 C0AD 36C6 347E 5A3F

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.osdn.me/mailman/archives/mingw-users/attachments/20181230/8cb8e3a9/attachment.sig>


More information about the MinGW-Users mailing list
Back to archive index