Toshiharu Harada
harad****@gmail*****
Sat Jun 4 16:38:13 JST 2011
(2011/06/04 10:21), Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Jamie Nguyen wrote: >> Yeh I'd be happy with "restart_domain". > > Maybe "reset_domain" describes better that it overwrites the entire > domainname than "restart_domain" ? > >> I think I've changed my mind so often that I don't even know what I prefer >> anymore! :-D > > No problem. Discussion is needed for choosing better one. > >> So let's settle on "restart_domain"? I think we've finally found a winner. > > OK. I'll include namespace support when proposing TOMOYO 2.4 next time. > > I want to use "restart_domain" or "reset_domain". > Jamie will be happy with "restart_domain". > Toshiharu and Oliver, what is your opinion? After reviewing this long thread, I'm begging to to think that the name "namespace" is a bit misleading. I'm not going to resetting the past arguments, but let me explain my points. If every "namespace" is independent from each other and domains are bound to its corresponding "namespace", then there's no problem to call it "namespace". If I understand correctly, "namespace" just allows different views and controls. "namespace" can add new layers on top of the base Linux system. Defining a "namespace" is creating a new workspace with independent controls (profile, exception and domain). Again, I'm not going to deny the past discussions, but let me remind the possibility that the naming of "namespace" owes the complexity. Best regards, Toshiharu
TOMOYO
Fork