Seiji Zenitani
zenit****@mac*****
Sun Feb 4 12:37:24 JST 2007
On 2007/02/03, at 19:09, Peter Dyballa wrote: > > Not me (but this does not matter as I am not using the built-in > AUCTeX). I think it's more reasonable to use the script texdoc as > viewer for all output formats that do not address "source specials" > or that are not meant to meat a particular paper format (because xdvi > cannot see which size and orientation a TeX document has in DVI which > does not record this information – and so Mac OS X "DVI" viewers like > TeXShop or TeXniscope also fail to convert them to PDF appropriately). > > The reason: texdoc is a valuable script to find (texdoc -l <name>) or > to view (texdoc <name>) TeX documentation, which can come in DVI, PS, > PDF, HTML, TXT format. Once texdoc has been customised to one's > preferences: why do this boring thing again in AUCTeX?! Isn't it more > reasonable to re-use the splendid texdoc? Well, I do ... > > -- > Greetings > > Pete OK, if texdoc is included in almost all major TeX distributions, "texdoc %o" would be more reasonable. If not, I'll take "open %o". Seiji
