[exerb-eng:0042] Re: A silly question about 'rbw' vs. 'rb'

Back to archive index

Rich rich****@lithi*****
Tue Feb 3 01:12:15 JST 2004


Cool. Thanks!

-Rich

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Yuya Kato" <yuya****@katod*****>
To: "exerb-eng" <exerb****@lists*****>
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 1:57 AM
Subject: [exerb-eng:0041] Re: A silly question about 'rbw' vs. 'rb'


>
> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 23:38:28 -0700
> "Rich" <hkmps****@hotma*****> wrote:
>
> > Why does the console window still show up in the compiled version - even
> > though I used the RBW extension to compile from?
> Exerb does not look an extension.
>
> > "set_core_by_name gui"
> > Is that something I can have mkexr add automatically - or does exerb do
it?
> A core is chosen by hand always.
>
> > That makes me think that I need to tell exerb which corefile to use...
> > but then why would it be a line in the EXR file?
> You can specify a core by five way.
>
> 1. command line: exerb -c <core's name>
> 2. command line: exerb -C <core's file path>
> 3. recipe: set_core_by_name <core's name>
> 4. recipe: set_core_by_filename <core's file name>
> 5. recipe: set_core_by_filepath <core's file path>
>
> Core's name and finding path are defined in config.rb.
>
> ====== Yuya Kato ======
> E-Mail yuya****@katod*****
>    Web http://nuance.cc/
> i-mode http://nuance.cc/i/
>
> _______________________________________________
> exerb-english mailing list
> exerb****@lists*****
> http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/exerb-english
>




More information about the exerb-english mailing list
Back to archive index